Ernst Haeckel and His Illustrations

Ernst Haeckel's Drawings Are Misleading

In the 1800's a man by the name of, Ernst Haeckel drew some illustrations of some embryos, but what is the truth about these drawings, do they prove Evolutionism? Or are they faulty?

____________________________________________________________________________

Ernst Haeckel was the 3rd most important Evolutionist in the 19th Century, when he read Charles Darwin’s book in German he found what he needed to get away from God. But what he needed now was some evidence. 10 years later they had no evidence. So he decided to help Chuck out. He decided to make some drawings to deceive Germany -and later to deceive the world. When I was first presented with these drawings I began to doubt Creation, but there's a simple argument for these drawings, they're actually fraudulent, they were proven fraud in 1876, and in fact, he was sued by his own university for creating fake evidence. How do we know they are fraudulent? Simple, in the first row of pictures known as the “first stage of embryonic development” shows lines next to what looks like the neck. Haeckel claimed these lines were gill slits. Those are not gill slits those later become bones in the ear and neck. But Okay, so he got some names wrong does that actually discredit his drawings? Well, yes and no, but to put an end to the doubt let’s see LIE 2.

Lie 2 would be that the closer two organisms were on the evolutionary tree the more similar would be their embryology, which obviously assumes universal common ancestry is true, which has not been proven. So if universal common ancestry isn’t true, then neither are Haeckel’s drawings. But yet, because Embryology is THE best evidence for Evolutionism they keep it in the textbooks as evidence. So, if you can take down this evidence, you can take down the theory, but unfortunately publishers of modern-day textbooks still have these images and illustrations in their textbooks even though these illustrations have been proven fraud over 130 years ago. But Evolutionists will argue against this argument and say that, 'It doesn't matter, it's a minor footnote in the history of science.' But when professors and teachers see these illustrations maybe THEY know that these images are fraudulent, but when students see these illustrations, they treat the illustrations as fact. Although they have the least bit of truth in them. These drawings can become misleading for several different reasons. I should start with the fact that,

1. All organisms share common decent.

The idea that all organisms share a common-ancestor is the idea that was made popular by Charles Darwin, after publishing his book on Natural Selection. The folks back in England called the book (very conveniently) 'Heresy'. Since Charles was a Catholic, the church called gave it the name, 'Heresy'. But, common decent teaches that all of the organisms on Earth evolved from a single celled, self replicating, organism.

2. Haeckel’s “First stage“ is the ACTUAL “First stage”

This too is false, Haeckel’s “First stage” is actually the “Mid stage“ of development. But the Evolutionists use these illustrations to demonstrate that, fundamentally, all vertebrates look similar in Embryology.

So when someone uses Embryology as evidence, most likely they are referring to Ernst Haeckel’s embryos. It’s amazing how many people reference to these drawings. I saw a video on YouTube from 2014 by an Evolutionist, “Stated Clearly” that used Embryology as evidence for Evolution. The video currently has more than 3 Million views. People are falling for this every day.

I hope you enjoyed this article, I’ll see you guys later.

Written by,

Jonathan Guzman